<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Blogs Office</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/" />
  <modified>2006-08-14T18:49:00Z</modified>
  <tagline></tagline>
  <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27</id>
  <generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="2.661">Movable Type</generator>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006, Gary</copyright>
  <entry>
    <title>It all comes down to &apos;Snakes&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003729.html" />
    <modified>2006-08-14T18:49:00Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-08-14T14:49:00-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3729</id>
    <created>2006-08-14T18:49:00Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Looks like Hollywood has only one bullet left in its chamber — &quot;Talladega Nights&quot; hung on to the top spot, but took a 50 percent hit. It won’t have the legs to catch “Pirates,” so that leaves only the cult-hit-in-the-making...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Looks like Hollywood has only one bullet left in its chamber — "Talladega Nights" hung on to the top spot, but took a 50 percent hit. </p>

<p>It won’t have the legs to catch “Pirates,” so that leaves only the cult-hit-in-the-making “Snakes on a Plane” to challenge. “Snakes” would have to open big, then hold on to its audience the following week, and that looks like a long shot. </p>

<p>It’s never over until the fat lady sings, though, so stay tuned. </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&apos;Pirates&apos; wins gold</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003711.html" />
    <modified>2006-08-07T18:44:02Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-08-07T14:44:02-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3711</id>
    <created>2006-08-07T18:44:02Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Barring some kind of “Snakes on a Plane” or “Talladega Nights” miracle, “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man&apos;s Chest” is certain to emerge as the championship round winner of Summer Movie Madness. In its fifth weekend of release, “Pirates” posted...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Barring some kind of “Snakes on a Plane” or “Talladega Nights” miracle, “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest” is certain to emerge as the championship round winner of Summer Movie Madness. In its fifth weekend of release,  “Pirates” posted $11 million, edging the $10.7 million posted by “Cars” — well ahead of the other contenders. </p>

<p>All that remains to be seen is which of you Pirate-backers chose the most opening-round winners. (Yes, it could all come down to the few thousand dollars that separated “Little Man” from “You, Me and Dupree.”)</p>

<p>All but one of the opening round matches have been decided, and although it’s possible a decisive winner has emerged already (you’ll know when we know), there is one more remaining opening-rounder to make the results complete — “Snakes” and “World Trade Center.” </p>

<p>All will be known by Aug. 21.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It isn&apos;t over til the fey pirate sings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003666.html" />
    <modified>2006-07-24T20:32:16Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-07-24T16:32:16-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3666</id>
    <created>2006-07-24T20:32:16Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">In the Life Imitates Art Dept: Never count Jack Sparrow out. After a 54 percent week two drop placed “Pirates” in jeopardy of losing the long-run race to “Cars,” “Pirates” rallied in week three to post a healthier 43 percent...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>In the Life Imitates Art Dept: Never count Jack Sparrow out. </p>

<p>After a 54 percent week two drop placed “Pirates” in jeopardy of losing the long-run race to “Cars,” “Pirates” rallied in week three to post a healthier 43 percent drop off. At that rate, it should post a week five number somewhere in the $12 million range, and edge “Cars” by $2 million. </p>

<p>As Movie Madness surmised, the “Pirates” box office curve would flatten a bit — a pattern typical of family films with all-ages appeal. </p>

<p>Also, there are no remaining tentpole pictures to grab screens away from “Pirates” — the closest thing is “Talladega Nights,” which doesn’t even open until Aug. 4, giving “Pirates” another free ride this weekend. </p>

<p>Flies in the ointment? </p>

<p>“The Ant Bully” might pull a little of the family audience away this weekend, but look how well “Pirates” stacked up against “Monster House,” which posted a strong number. </p>

<p>“Pirates” crushed “Lady In the Water,” in what some might have seen as a battle of horror-ish movies. Except that one is actually a comedy, the other a fable. And if “Pirates” really is being received by audiences as an absurdist comedy rather than a horror adventure, as we suspect is true, it may actually run into “Talladega Nights” at exactly the wrong time. </p>

<p>Its big week five match-up with “Cars” will occur just as Johnny Depp goes goofball to goofball with Will Ferrell, who will probably open 3,000 screens. </p>

<p>Put another way: It’s not over yet.<br />
 </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is it yo ho ho-ver?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003612.html" />
    <modified>2006-07-17T17:29:17Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-07-17T13:29:17-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3612</id>
    <created>2006-07-17T17:29:17Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">&quot;Pirates of the Carribean&quot; just set the all-time 10-day box office record ($258 million), so you’re thinking: there&apos;s your winner. Yet the numbers also show vulnerability in what figures to be its long-term battle with &quot;Cars.&quot; &quot;Pirates&quot; took a 54...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Pirates of the Carribean" just set the all-time 10-day box office record ($258 million), so you’re thinking: there's your winner. </p>

<p>Yet the numbers also show vulnerability in what figures to be its long-term battle with "Cars." </p>

<p>"Pirates" took a 54 percent hit weekend-to-weekend, dropping from $132 million to $62 million. Follow that progression five weeks out, and you get weekend booty amounting to $7-$8 million, versus the $10 that “Cars “ has already posted. </p>

<p>But such projections probably aren’t worth much. "Cars" itself reversed a precipitious second-weekend drop to become a quality long-term earner. "Pirates," a family film, is positioned to keep pulling in that durable all-ages audience.</p>

<p>And there’s this: "Pirates'" weekend numbers are skewed by the fact that it's earning so damn much money DURING THE WEEK. Like $10 million to $20 million per day. With so many families on vacation, every day is Saturday. </p>

<p>Does that help "Pirates" or hurt it? Don't know, but it’s still earning $15,000 per screen, in full saturation all over the country. </p>

<p>"Cars" backers have reason to be hopeful, but we don't know if we'd bet against "Pirates" at this point. Next week may tell the tale. </p>

<p>In other news: This week's also-ran race between four and five seeds "Little Man" and "Dupree" was just as close as our genius seeding committee predicted: "Man" posted $21.7 million, "Dupree" posted $21.3 million. <br />
Could be a similar dust-up this week between "Lady in the Water" and "My Super-Ex Girlfriend," pitting M. Night Shyamalan believers against those looking for laughs. Fly in the ointment — Kevin Smith's "Clerks" sequel opens, which could take a bite out of "Girlfriend."</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&apos;Pirates&apos; HUGE, but will it last?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003578.html" />
    <modified>2006-07-10T17:12:02Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-07-10T13:12:02-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3578</id>
    <created>2006-07-10T17:12:02Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">This just in: “Superman” is NOT faster than a speeding bullet, because “Pirates of the Caribbean” IS a speeding bullet, and it crushed the man of steel this past weekend. “Pirates” broke the all-time non-holiday weekend record and grossed almost...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This just in: “Superman” is NOT faster than a speeding bullet, because “Pirates of the Caribbean” IS a speeding bullet, and it crushed the man of steel this past weekend. </p>

<p>“Pirates” broke the all-time non-holiday weekend record and grossed almost as much in one weekend ($132 million) as “Superman Returns” has ($140 million) in all ten days of its release. The “Superman” gross includes a paltry $21 million this past weekend, big enough to beat “Devil Wears Prada,” but small enough to leave the door open to some sort of “Lady in the Water” (buzz at NY press junket was mixed) or “Super Ex-Girlfriend” surprise. (Don’t expect much in this bracket from “Miami Vice” — the studio has pushed press screenings back to the evening of July 27th, to keep reviews out of the July 28 papers.) </p>

<p>In Summer Movie Madness “Pirates” had the week off (not an off week) — it was to go up against “Pulse,” but that movie was bumped so “Pirates” was awarded a forfeit. Week two will give us a much better idea, but even if it loses a catastrophic portion of its massive opening audience, it’s still going to pull at least $50-60 million, and will waltz to what figures to be a showdown with “Talladega Nights” down the road. And “Pirates” is the last of the tentpole blockbusters — there’s really nothing out there to take its legs out, the way “Pirates” undercut “Superman.” </p>

<p>The looming question: can “Pirates” or anybody beat that $10 million week five “Cars” number? “Cars” didn’t open great, but after an unimpressive week two, it’s been tenacious in holding an audience (only a 29 percent drop this past weekend). </p>

<p>It’s been a lame summer for family films, and that helped “Cars.” But that also helps “Pirates,” which is family-ish and extraordinarily popular among young boys, judging by the snotty email <A HREF="http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/living/14984483.htm">we've</a> received. </p>

<p>“Superman” is not going to be at $10 million in week five. But “Pirates” — that’s another story. </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&apos;Superman&apos; probably not super enough</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003569.html" />
    <modified>2006-07-04T17:59:27Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-07-04T13:59:27-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3569</id>
    <created>2006-07-04T17:59:27Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Everything seemed in place for the Man of Steel to steal this summer&apos;s Movie Madness competition. No previous summer flick had yet broken from the pack, and &quot;Superman&quot; was the beneficiary of good reviews, a holiday weekend and a lot...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Howard</name>
      
      <email>gensleh@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Everything seemed in place for the Man of Steel to steal this summer's Movie Madness competition. No previous summer flick had yet broken from the pack, and "Superman" was the beneficiary of good reviews, a holiday weekend and a lot of rain.</p>

<p>But, oh, that 150-minute running time. Or maybe it was the "Superman Is Gay" stories. Or the "Superman is Jesus" stories. Whatever, the man who can bust blocks with his fists didn't put up the blockbuster numbers everyone expected with an estimated $52.6 million opening three-day weekend.</p>

<p>Will it have legs?</p>

<p>'Cars' didn't have the killer opening weekend either, but its slow-and-steady pace has earned it a trip to the finals over the higher-grossing "Da Vinci Code" and "X-Men: The Last Stand."</p>

<p>The other movie to move ahead this week is "The Devil Wears Prada," whose suprising $27 million opening crushed the opening weekend of "The Lake House."</p>

<p>Now, all eyes turn to "Pirates," opening this Friday.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&apos;Click&apos; wastes &apos;Waist;&apos; But &apos;Cars&apos; looms</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003546.html" />
    <modified>2006-06-26T16:54:32Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-06-26T12:54:32-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3546</id>
    <created>2006-06-26T16:54:32Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Not a great weekend for those who backed “Click” as an upset special in the “Cars” bracket. Adam Sandler’s movie posted $40 million, not a big number. Enough to beat “Waist Deep,” but, factoring in a 40 percent decline, surely...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Not a great weekend for those who backed “Click” as an upset special in the “Cars” bracket. </p>

<p>Adam Sandler’s movie posted $40 million, not a big number. Enough to beat “Waist Deep,” but, factoring in a 40 percent decline, surely not big enough to push past “Cars” ($33 million second week) in a week two showdown. </p>

<p>That means it’s all about “Cars” and “Code,” and “Cars” posted a healthy $22 million this past weekend to easily best “Da Vinci’s” $18 million. </p>

<p>Looks like “Cars” in this bracket, barring some unforeseen “Click” surprise. “Click” has the youngish male comedy field to itself for the near future (“Nacho Libre” is tanking), but “Superman Returns” is arriving Tuesday night, and it promises to blow most other movies to bits. (Also, “Click” sucks.)</p>

<p>How is “Superman?” Pretty darn good. The only box office handicap I see: it’s also pretty darn long. Two hours, 24 minutes. That’s fewer showings per screen, but it’s going to be on so many screens, maybe it won’t matter. Tough sit for a little kid, though. </p>

<p>Bold prediction: “Superman Returns” will beat “A Scanner Darkly.” Handily! </p>

<p>The chosen format of pairing down-the-road box office results has turned out to be a great equalizer, especially as so many movies have done such a bad job holding on to their audiences. "Cars," for instance, beat "Code" by dropping just 33 percent from week two, a pretty good number in the scheme of things. <br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It&apos;s all about the match-ups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003530.html" />
    <modified>2006-06-19T16:38:15Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-06-19T12:38:15-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3530</id>
    <created>2006-06-19T16:38:15Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">So this is why people in the NCAA complain about first round match-ups. “Nacho Libre,” which has the feel of a movie with some box office legs, is already out of the game. It posted a strong opening of $27.5...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>So this is why people in the NCAA complain about first round match-ups. “Nacho Libre,” which has the feel of a movie with some box office legs, is already out of the game. </p>

<p>It posted a strong opening of $27.5 million, nearly toppling the mega-hyped “Cars,” but still lost its first round Movie Madness match-up with fast-fading “The Break-up” ($39 million). </p>

<p>Hey, don’t blame us. Blame the Hollywood genius who opened “Nacho” opposite “Fast and Furious 3,” and week-two “Cars,” essentially halving the kiddie and teen audiences from which it needs to draw. </p>

<p>Incidentally, “Fast and Furious 3” (which opened to fair reviews and $24 million) is out as well, toppled by a week one-er with “Cars” ($60 million). </p>

<p>All of this boils town to the week-three match-up between “Cars” and “The Da Vinci Code,” and holy cow is it going to be close. “Cars” got hammered - dropping nearly 50 percent to roughly $32 million. If it drops another 50, it’s weekend three tally will be $16 million or so — it needs $19 million to beat “Code.”<br />
 <br />
Given the influence of crowd-pleasing “Nacho,” and the new Adam Sandler movie “Click,” we’d say it looks grim for “Cars.” </p>

<p>But look . . . up in the sky. It’s a bird. It’s a plane. No, it’s the movie that’s probably going to knock the crap out of all the other players. Trade reviews of “Superman Returns” are in today, and they’re ecstatic. Variety and Hollywood Reporter are predicting all-time B.O. numbers for the movie. </p>

<p>Movie Madness will check it out Friday. We’ll give you a heads up.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>We&apos;ve lost our &apos;Pulse&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003519.html" />
    <modified>2006-06-13T20:56:05Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-06-13T16:56:05-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3519</id>
    <created>2006-06-13T20:56:05Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">If you were one of the &quot;Movie Madness&quot; prognosticators who went out on a limb and picked the second &quot;Pirates of the Caribbean&quot; to beat &quot;Pulse&quot; in a week one showdown, you are correct. &quot;Pulse&quot; has been moved to September....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Howard</name>
      
      <email>gensleh@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>If you were one of the "Movie Madness" prognosticators who went out on a limb and picked the second "Pirates of the Caribbean" to beat "Pulse" in a week one showdown, you are correct.</p>

<p>"Pulse" has been moved to September.</p>

<p>This move should affect exactly <i>zero</i> brackets.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can &apos;Cars&apos; withstand a long drive?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003515.html" />
    <modified>2006-06-12T18:49:16Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-06-12T14:49:16-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3515</id>
    <created>2006-06-12T18:49:16Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Beatable. That&apos;s how &quot;Cars&quot; now looks for its round three matchup against &quot;The Da Vinci Code,&quot; given its $62 million opening, but it&apos;s going to be close. The numbers for &quot;Code&quot; have been dropping fast, but it had a higher...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Beatable. That's how "Cars" now looks for its round three matchup against "The Da Vinci Code," given its $62 million opening, but it's going to be close. </p>

<p>The numbers for "Code" have been dropping fast, but it had a higher opening that "Cars." The key will be "Cars" second-weekend numbers, and the signs are hopeful for Disney-Pixar. Reviews were mixed, but audience surveys indicate that 92 percent rated the movie highly (compared to 49 percent for "The Break Up"). Animated family films tend to take less of a week-to-week hit than most other genres, so "Cars" still looks strong. </p>

<p>"The Break Up," incidentally, took a pretty hard fall - dropping nearly 50 percent to $20 million. It will be hard-pressed to match the $15 million week three number for "X-Men; The Last Stand."<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>InVincible?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003488.html" />
    <modified>2006-06-05T14:05:45Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-06-05T10:05:45-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3488</id>
    <created>2006-06-05T14:05:45Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Someone&apos;s a star -- the only question is whether it is Vince Vaughn or Jennifer Aniston. My money&apos;s on Vince, whose comedy winning streak is now four ( &quot;Old School&quot; &quot;Dodgeball&quot; &quot;The Wedding Crashers&quot;) after a $38-million opening that left...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Someone's a star -- the only question is whether it is Vince Vaughn or Jennifer Aniston. </p>

<p>My money's on Vince, whose comedy winning streak is now four ( "Old School" "Dodgeball" "The Wedding Crashers") after a $38-million opening that left "The Break Up" atop the box office, beating "X-Men: The Last Stand." </p>

<p>The numbers shocked Hollywood -- "The Break Up" had been forecast to open lower, "X-Men" to hold more of its audience. But moviegoers avoided the mutants in droves -- it lost a whopping 67 percent of its audience. </p>

<p>Is "The Last Stand" suddenly vulnerable? Its $34 million is still good enough to beat MI3 and probably "The Break-Up" in its bracket, but if it drops another 50 percent to $17 million in week three...does anyone have a read on "Nacho Libre?" If it has the cult duration of its director's last movie ("Napoleon Dynamite"), plus the built-in brand loyalty and whatever Jack Black brings to the table, it could be formidable. </p>

<p>Meanwhile, the summer's true word of mouth hit continues to be "Over The Hedge," which lost only 20 percent of its audience to take in another $20 million. It grossed more this week than "The Da Vinci Code," but won't beat "Code" in that bracket. And the party for "Hedge" will be over this week, when "Cars" opens.</p>

<p>The "Hedge" numbers bode well for "Cars" -- a good family film looks like it will have legs this season, looking down the road to a week four match-up between "Cars" and "Code."</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It&apos;s anybody&apos;s summer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003469.html" />
    <modified>2006-05-30T20:06:30Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-05-30T16:06:30-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3469</id>
    <created>2006-05-30T20:06:30Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Playing Movie Madness gives you some idea why Hollywood executives spend weekends tearing out their hair (and Monday paying somebody to put it back in). Let’s say you’re Paramount trying to revive the &quot;Mission: Impossible&quot; franchise: You go out and...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Playing Movie Madness gives you some idea why Hollywood executives spend weekends tearing out their hair (and Monday paying somebody to put it back in). </p>

<p>Let’s say you’re Paramount trying to revive the "Mission: Impossible" franchise: You go out and get red-hot J.J. Abrams and a nice cast that includes Oscar winner Philip Seymour Hoffman and you miraculously end up with a really nice movie. </p>

<p>U.S. audiences, though, are indifferent. </p>

<p>Meanwhile, Bryan Singer vacates the "X-Men" series, so Fox hires Brett "After the Sunset" Ratner and cast additions like Kelsey Grammer. Ratner delivers a routine CGI slog, and it makes $120 MILLION IN FOUR DAYS - smashing the Memorial Day holiday record held by Steven Spielberg and "Jurassic Park." <br />
For "X-Men: The Last Stand" backers, this is tremendous news. Unless something miraculous happens with "Nacho Libre," the mutants are going cruise to the final four, where they’ll be well-positioned to compete with other titles. </p>

<p>Why?</p>

<p>Because the current competition is collapsing. "The Da Vinci Code" plummetted 56 percent weekend-to-weekend - the biggest drop in Tom Hanks' career. The falloff makes "Da Vinci" much more susceptible to apparently turbo-charged "Cars."</p>

<p>It’s getting interesting!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&apos;Code&apos; Blew Past Competition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003447.html" />
    <modified>2006-05-23T18:07:42Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-05-23T14:07:42-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3447</id>
    <created>2006-05-23T18:07:42Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Neither the Vatican nor the Priory of Snotty Critics could stop &quot;The Da Vinci Code,&quot; which made $77 million at the box office this weekend. That&apos;s a big number - second only in adult-themed weekend gross to &quot;The Passion of...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Neither the Vatican nor the Priory of Snotty Critics could stop "The Da Vinci Code," which made $77 million at the box office this weekend. That's a big number - second only in adult-themed weekend gross to "The Passion of the Christ" and you don't have to be a Harvard-educated symbolist to decode the pattern there. </p>

<p>Even better news for those backing "Code," -- its audience was more than 50 percent ancient (Over 30), so it should hold up well against "X-Men: The Last Stand." As a drama, it should also have its own niche next to Vince Vaughn's "The Break-Up" (June 2) which insiders report is not tracking particularly well next to blockbuster titles. Also encouraging -- more than half the opening weekend audience hadn't read the book. </p>

<p>The news was good but not great for "Over the Hedge." Its $39 million take was only average for computer-animated films. It looks like a kids-only title, and even though it will have the family-film field to itself over Memorial day, it's not going to pull in teens or adults the way "Shrek" did. And "Cars" arrives in two weeks.</p>

<p>"MI3" collapsed to $11 million, although it drenched the hapless "Poseidon," which managed only $9 million.   </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&apos;Code&apos; Blew</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003383.html" />
    <modified>2006-05-17T21:06:17Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-05-17T17:06:17-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3383</id>
    <created>2006-05-17T21:06:17Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Those of you picked &quot;The Da Vinci Code&quot; to win Summer Movie Madness may be doing some nail-biting this weekend and in the weeks ahead. After a screening for critics at the Cannes Film Festival yesterday, the press has not...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Howard</name>
      
      <email>gensleh@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Those of you picked "The Da Vinci Code" to win <A HREF="http://pdn.philly.com/2006/bracketmaster.htm">Summer Movie Madness</a> may be doing some nail-biting this weekend and in the weeks ahead.</p>

<p>After a screening for critics at the Cannes Film Festival yesterday, the press has not been especially kind:</p>

<p><LI>Philip Wuntch of the Dallas Morning News wrote the movie "often has no excitement at all."<br />
<LI>Roger Moore of the Orlando Sentinel called it "a bloodless best-seller adaptation, competent but uninspiring."<br />
<LI>Kirk Honeycutt of the Hollywood Reporter said "Code" "never rises to the level of a guilty pleasure."<br />
<LI>And Todd McCarthy of Variety said it was "a stodgy, grim thing."</p>

<p>But Lou Lumenick of the New York Post gave it four stars.</p>

<p>Go figure.</p>

<p>Gary Thompson's review will be in the Daily News and online Friday. In the meantime, "X-Men," "Pirates" and "Cars" are looking better every day.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mission: Improbable</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/archives/003332.html" />
    <modified>2006-05-15T14:45:16Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-05-15T10:45:16-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.pnionline.com,2006:/dnblog/movies/27.3332</id>
    <created>2006-05-15T14:45:16Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">If Tom Cruise is considered box office poison because his movie opened at $48 million, somebody should slap a Mr. Yuk sticker on Lindsay Lohan. Her lame comedy &quot;Just My Luck&quot; opened at $5.5 million, which is to say it...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
      <email>thompsg@phillynews.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/movies/">
      <![CDATA[<p>If Tom Cruise is considered box office poison because his movie opened at $48 million, somebody should slap a Mr. Yuk sticker on Lindsay Lohan. </p>

<p>Her lame comedy "Just My Luck" opened at $5.5 million, which is to say it also closed there. If you had "Luck" as an upset special, you're out of same; ditto "Poseidon" which posted only $20 million and finished second to MI3 ($24 million). </p>

<p>And MI3 isn't exactly slaying them - its take dropped 49 percent week-to-week, in part because "Poseidon" is in more or less the same action-effects genre. <br />
What this likely means: MI3 is almost certainly going to get crushed by "X-Men: The Last Stand." Looks like the only thing that can stop "X-Men" now is a phenomenal showing by "The Break Up" or "Nacho Libre" down the road. For that to happen, people would have to be dying for a decent comedy. Wait a second - there is legitmate word-of-mouth hit out there, and it's.... "RV." The Robin Williams slapstick comedy saw it's audience drop a scant 14 percent. It's almost a month old, and still beat Lohan's picture by $4.5 million. </p>

<p><b>TIP SHEET:</b> Blogsoffice has seen "Cars," and it while it ain't bad, it ain't no "Finding Nemo." Could be an opening in that bracket for Adam Sandler or Tom Hanks, who incidentally is hyping "The Da Vinci Code"  in the London papers by saying, "the story we are telling is loaded with all kinds of hooey and fun scavenger-hunt kind of nonsense." <br />
Why didn't Oliver Stone think of that? </p>

<p><b>WISHFUL THINKING DEPT.</b> Robert De Niro is reportedly interested in buying the New York Observer. This got Blogsoffice thinking: Wouldn't Will Smith make a great publisher? We'd certainly be willing to go back and revise our reviews of "Hitch." Even "Bad Boys II." </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
